Removes the sources from a New York Times article.
Citation Eraser Extension
Without hyperlinks to make further research easy or captivating images, do we still feel connected to the information presented or motivated to learn more? Are we more engaged with an article if we know it was published recently or do we disengage if we can’t put the article in some context of time and place? How is an article’s authenticity changed when there are no opportunities for corrections or explanation of context in the footer? Do we take the information presented as truthful just because it comes from the New York Times, or do the words lose their validity without proof of a trustworthy author with journalistic integrity? Sometimes we think an article as just a story or presentation of information, but if that’s all we get then the Times becomes little more than an glorified blog post.
Source Manifest.json
Similar Extensions
Unlocked 0 0 ★ 21.56KiB
Ground News - Bias Checker 0 52 ★ 1.14MiB
Remove Wikipedia Citations 0 4 ★ 15.25KiB
Biasly News Check 0 4 ★ 2.1MiB
News Article Viewer 0 1 ★ 15.83KiB
Proem News 0 0 ★ 6.28KiB
Gestor de Citas 0 0 ★ 26.92KiB
Better Twitter 0 4 ★ 30.66KiB
Bias Finder 0 19 ★ 58.42KiB
AuthentiSci 0 0 ★ 160KiB
Citation Manager for Google Chrome™ 0 17 ★ 142KiB
Bibcitation Bibliography & Citation Generator 0 11 ★ 563KiB
Twitter/X thread Reader 0 1 ★ 34.42KiB
NY Times Articles 0 48 ★ 31.09KiB
Certify-News 0 1 ★ 63.4KiB
Medium Member-Only Post Remover 0 4 ★ 286KiB
Arxiv Citation Redirector 0 1 ★ 5.98MiB
Reddit Publish Date 0 4 ★ 142KiB
Language Comparer for Wikipedia 0 1 ★ 18.2KiB
Sourcer 0 4 ★ 5.33MiB
Typo Reporter 0 0 ★ 10.52KiB
MarkALink 0 10 ★ 103KiB
新聞收集器 0 8 ★ 18.0KiB
Wikipedia NoRefs 0 1 ★ 21.5KiB